Scent Sense
Background.
I remember reading somewhere that 80% of all sales of fish
attractants end up in the tackle boxes of anglers who fish for
warmwater species, mainly bass. Whether that is the correct
figure or not, there is no doubt that black bass fishermen buy
this stuff by the bucketful. In other fisheries, salmon anglers
also depend heavily on scents, but scents are not big among
trouters or fly fishermen. In saltwater, fish attractants are not
widely used at all, not even for gamefish like striped bass or
snook, which are caught on many of the same kinds of lures as
freshwater bass. I surf fish about 200 nights a year and
catch hundreds of striped bass weekly on jigs and soft plastics,
along with countless bluefish and weakfish in season. The idea
never enters my mind to use scents to increase the number of
strikes. Sure did try 'em - various potent essences of eel,
shedder crab, menhaden, herring, squid, anchovy, grass shrimp -
under all different kinds of water and angling conditions, and on
many different lure types. Never did find any evidence that
inshore saltwater gamefish have a sweet tooth for scented lures
any more than they strike unscented ones. I'm not alone on this;
no one else uses them either. But when it comes to freshwater
bass fishing, we pour this stuff on like it was holy water. It
even becomes a confidence thing with some guys, where they just
get to feeling that the scent is nearly as important as their own
fishing skills or presentation abilities. This article cautions
against putting so much of your confidence into scents. Yes, use
them wisely and well for warmwater bass, but understand that
scents are not a magic elixer to cure all your bass fishing
ailments, no crutch to compensate for fishing skills - just
another tool in the angler's arsenal.
It's Controversial. Do they work?
Which one is the best? Why do bass bite on garlic or anise
(licorice) scents? The only honest answer is that no one truly
knows for sure what a bass thinks when it tastes a garlic or
scent-drenched worm. But then again, no one really knows what a
bass thinks when it sees a spinnerbait either. Heck, I am not
even sure I know what a spinnerbait is supposed to imitate.
Nevertheless, most bass anglers will say they believe that scents
are positive attractants that can be smelled by bass during the
closing phases of a strike sequence, and tasted and savored once
the lure is held in the mouth of a bass.
Basic Anatomy. Rather than talking
in terms of scents, smells, or tastes, another way to understand
fish attractants is in terms of the molecules they contain and
what response those molecules are supposed to trigger in a bass
nose, mouth and therefore the bass brain. So let's start by
looking up the nose of a bass. Bass have left and right nostrils
just above their mouths. There are two openings in each nostril -
a separate entrance and exit hole for water-borne scents to flow
right through. Some studies have also suggested that bass have
scent and taste receptors inside and even outside their mouths.
Regardless of where they are located, each receptor cell
resembles a tiny pit or cavity, each with its own little pathway
leading to the brain. Receptor cells come in all different sizes
and types. Some are triggered only by scents, others in and
around the mouth are triggered only by tastes. Some receptor
cells are only triggered by molecules of odorless, tasteless
chemicals such as sex hormones during mating, or fear or shock
pheromones given off by frightened or injured creatures. A
spawning male's milt cells even have such receptors on it, and
use them to detect and swim towards chemicals emitted into the
water by the female's eggs, thereby finding and fertilizing them.
In the nose or mouth, the receptor cells only send scent messages
to the brain if the correct size and type of water-borne molecule
fits correctly into the receptor cell cavity. If a scent molecule
is not the right size or type to fit properly into a particular
receptor cell cavity, then no message gets fired to the brain.
Using a pass/fail kind of approach, let's assume for this article
that a bass will take either positive or negative actions based
on how its brain interprets the messages that the receptor cells
are firing at it about the molecules being detected on your
lures.
Mask the Negatives. Some studies
have suggested that bass are turned off if they detect sun block
lotions, bug repellents, tobacco, household detergents, motor
oils, fuels, and other unnatural chemicals that may be on your
hands, and get transferred onto your line and lure when you touch
them. Now, I will occasionally do the dishes for my wife, help
with the baby's laundry, change the oil in the car, slather on
the sunscreen, the bug juice, and enjoy a cigarette out on the
water. So before you even start to fish, just soap it up. Just
keep a bar of Ivory soap on the boat. It is 99.44% pure, no added
perfumes, and it floats if you drop it. Just don't bend over if
you can't trust your fishing partner. Even still, sometimes when
fishing is slow, I can't help but think about all these bad
smells piled up against me, and my hands start to sweat. This
only make matters worse because some studies have also suggested
that some fish species are repelled by L-Serine, a tasteless,
odorless chemical found in the skin oils of humans and mammals.
If these studies are true, then fish attractants can help us by
masking the negatives. That is, some of the oily molecules in
fish attractants will occlude (cover up) or adhere to the
negative molecules you left on your lure. The whole molecular
mozilla may be too big to fit into a scent receptor cavity in the
fish's nostril. No molecule in the receptor cell? No message to
the brain? Voila! The fish smells nothing. No sunscreen, no bug
spray, no sweaty palms. So this is the first reason suggested for
using fish attractants - because they may neutralize some
unwanted, potentially negative scents.
Tie It On and Apply Dry. I like to
apply attractants to dry lures right after tying them to the
line. First, I just handled the lure pretty good, so the natural
oils in the attracant may mask any negative scents transferered
onto the lure from my hands. Second, I think a dry lure soaks up
and gets coated with attractants better than a lure that has
already soaked up water. If the lure has feathers, hair, a
fiberguard, a skirt, a screwed-in treble hook holder plate -
anything else that is porous, fibrous, or has little crevices -
then that's where I apply the attractant, not to a smooth plastic
or metal surface on the lure. I really don't reapply the
attractant all that often.
Do they Smell It or Taste It? Many
anglers believe that motion, shape, noise, and water displacement
are the primary stimuli that cause a bass to strike a lure. To
me, motion is the key. Fish eyes and lateral lines become fixated
on the sight and feel of living motion - or the illusion thereof
in lures. The value of fish attractant formulas is not so much
that bass detect them from afar, and come running to find the
source of such a delicious mystery aroma. Sure, maybe that
happens some times, but the majority of times a bass is initially
alerted to a motion, a shape, a noise or water displacement, and
then sight usually becomes the dominant sense used to close the
distance to its quarry and to commit itself to striking. Upon
striking, which an angler often does not feel, the scent and
taste of the attractant will cause the fish to hold the lure in
its mouth longer, rather than taste an unadulterated DEET, PVC
plastic and L-Serine cocktail and spit it out. So this is the
second reason suggested for using fish attractants - because they
may provide an angler with more time - a few seconds more to
realize a fish is holding the lure in it's mouth and to set the
hook.
What's in 'em? The active
ingregients in most fish attractants are oils extracted from
shad, crayfish, baitfish, worms and/or other water-oriented
creatures. Active ingredients is some attractants may also
partially or completely include extracts of garlic, anise, other
plants, fruits, or seeds. Some are also laced with odorless,
tasteless compounds of enzymes, hormones and pheromones that the
manufacturer suggests may trigger a feeding response or other
type of biological response in bass. Often, the materials used to
manufacture fish attractants are the by-products or left-overs of
some other product manufacturing process, like making fish meal
or cat food for instance. These by-products are often pressed or
otherwise further processed to extract the oils and compounds to
be used in the fish attractants. The extracted oils contain
natural protein and amino acid particles. These active
ingredients are often mixed with a heavier, thicker inert base
oil or gel that provides for better, longer-lasting underwater
adhesion to plastic or metal lure surfaces. The fish oils,
protein and amino acid particles are lighter and will separate
out of the inert base and disperse into the water, mostly within
a few minutes of application. Being lighter than water, the
released oils will head straight for the surface of the water.
Think of the oil molecules as if they were helium balloons. As
they separate from the base oil or gel, they don't linger around,
but head straight for the ozone layer.
Name Some Names. One of the first
scents I favored was Dr. Juice, who is still
around today. This stuff really had an impressive fragrance like
a living fish. Healthy members of many fish species often exude a
fragrant, fruity body odor. I can only compare it to the
delicate, sweet scent of freshly-cut cantaloupe or honeydew
melons. Anyway, Dr. Juice also had a very thin and runny
composition and leaked and dripped all over way back when I used
it. I also liked Fish Formula gel - not because
of it's scent, but because it really lubed your lure down better
than anything else I ever used for pitching and flipping deep
into dry, raspy reeds and dry, leafy, bark-covered brush and
limbs. Lures would slither right through on the cast. Saved me
from an awful lot of de-tailings with soft plastics. They even
popularized a metal flake sparkle scales gel for a little while.
However, the sparkle scales would end up all over everything you
touched - your hands, your face, your rod, reel, tackle box, your
clothes, your lunch. You were kind of like King Midas, anything
you touched turned to gold sparkle scales. Years later, I still
have rods and reels with sparkle scales on 'em. Every so often, I
also tried various aerosol spray cans of different manufacturers'
shad, worm and crayfish flavored stuff. Only problem was that
many of them seemed to hurl out semi-solid particles, chunks,
gobs and thick stuff that would clog the spray nozzle but good.
The stuff would also drip on the can top, collect in the rim, and
eventually leak all over my tackle bag. Also tried the Berkley
Strike when it first came out. This was a thick, jismy kind of
stuff. It hardened and clogged the applicator nozzle between
trips and on hot summer days. Around this time I remarried, and
my new wife didn't like the essence of dead shad and crawdads
emanating from my bass fishing clothes and my bass tackle bags.
Truthfully, I had to agree with her. Besides that, she would not
let me bring them into the house any more. So I got some BANG
Anise-scented spray. Has a fresh, sweet fragrance like living
fish, and so do my fishing clothes, boat and tackle. Also sprays
out in a fine, steady stream that never hardens or clogs the
sprayer. Really doesn't leak either. Still have my wife and still
have the BANG in my bag.
The New Stuff. In recent years,
some new attractants have arrived on the scene. First, there is Scientific Bass Products
Kickn' Bass which comes in a powerful garlic scent. It almost has
a cult following among the anglers who swear by it. Then
there is Benchmark
Chemicals Yum, which was concocted by renowned bass
scientist, Dr. Loren Hill. Yum is a compound of several things,
including masking agents, special fish oils and the enzymes given
off from shad when they are injured or frightened. I have also
recently been hearing about Hot Sauce, which
comes from the Pacific Northwest salmon fishery, but is literally
leaking into bass fishing circles out West too. Mr. Goop is a new water
repellant gel type formula that comes in garlic or anise. The
very latest attractant on the market comes from Mister Twister. You don't
apply it to the lure, because the attractant is already inside
the lure. They’ve created a new brand of soft plastic called Exude.
They mold salts, scents and flavors right into the soft plastic
itself. In water, the soft plastic develops a slime coat - a
potent blend of proteins, minerals and amino acids found to
stimulate bass to feed. This natural slime coat also sheds
unwanted human and man-made odors found to repel bass. As if that
wasn’t enough, the Exude plastic formula also results in a
softer, more natural feeling lure! In fact, the slippery slime
coat makes it feel just like a baitfish or living water
creature. Mister Twister has crafted their new Exude lures
carefully, and they believe they have created a new generation of
soft, scented plastics.
Among the Newest of the New. There's not another
attractant quite like MegaStrike says MegaStrike company president
Bob Uhrig. It's unique in that it's formulated on proteins and
amino acids that bass require to stay healthy. Bass need these
types of items every day. Their bodies do not store them, and
instinctively crave them if they do not get them on a daily
basis When bass strike baits with MegaStrike applied to
them, they do not let them go, resulting in better strike
detection, says Uhrig. Comes in a gel form that does not wash off
easily, and the manufacturer offers a 100% money back guarantee
if you feel MegaStrike does not help you to catch more fish.
Do they work? Which one is the best? Why do bass bite on
garlic or anise scents? I don't know if we have answered any of
these questions here. And if you enjoyed reading this, I don't
think that you will suddenly stop debating whether scents work or
not. At the very least though, you might agree with most anglers
who say that dousing lures with scents usually should not
diminish your chances of catching bass. But you knew that
already, didn't you? |